Most buyers don't pick a decoration method. They pick a look — and the method gets chosen for them by whoever quotes the job. That's fine when the printer is honest about trade-offs. It goes sideways when "we'll just screen print it" gets quoted on a 12-piece run, or "DTG is fine" gets quoted on a polyester sports jersey, or "embroidery looks more premium" gets quoted on a thin fashion tee that pulls threads after one wash.

Decoration is half the cost of merch and 100% of how it's perceived. Worth understanding the actual mechanics before you sign off.

Here's how the methods stack up — from the workhorse you'll order most often, to the special-effect tier you should be careful with.

Screen printing — the volume answer

Screen printing pushes ink through a stencilled mesh screen onto fabric, one colour at a time. Each colour needs its own screen, and each screen has a setup cost: artwork separation, film positives, mesh stretching, exposure, registration on the press. Once the screens are made, the actual printing is fast — which is why screen print scales.

The economics are simple: setup costs are fixed, per-piece cost is low. The crossover where screen print becomes the cheapest option per piece sits somewhere around 30–50 units for a single-colour print, and shifts higher with each additional colour. A four-colour design at 50 units is a different conversation to a four-colour design at 500.

What screen print does well: bold solid colours, large coverage areas, opacity on dark garments, longevity through washes (a properly cured plastisol print outlasts most other methods). What it doesn't do: photo-realistic gradients, fine halftone detail at small scale, or short runs that don't justify the screen setup.

One thing buyers should know: screen printing on 100% polyester is its own conversation. Polyester dye migrates into the ink under heat, so a red poly jersey can ghost pink through a white print after curing. Solving it requires barrier inks, low-temperature curing, and a printer who knows what they're doing. If your printer quotes the same price for cotton and polyester screen printing without asking which one you want, get a second quote.

Embroidery — the premium default

Embroidery doesn't print. It stitches. A digital file is converted to stitch data, the file goes to a multi-head industrial machine, and the design gets sewn into the fabric using actual thread. Modern machines run up to 1,500 stitches a minute — but the time per piece is still dominated by stitch count, not machine speed.

What this changes: embroidery has a one-time digitising cost (typically $30–80 per logo) and a per-piece cost driven by stitch count, not unit count the way screen print is. Twenty pieces and 200 pieces cost about the same per piece for embroidery. That makes it the right answer for small uniform runs, polos, caps, and anywhere "premium feel" matters more than coverage.

What embroidery doesn't do: large designs (thread density gets uneconomic past about 10cm wide), fine detail (text under about 5mm gets lumpy), gradients (you can blend thread colours but not smoothly), or thin fabrics (a heavy embroidered logo on a 140 gsm fashion tee will pull and pucker). Plush fabrics like fleece need denser embroidery to keep the pile from showing through.

The honest pricing comparison: a one-colour screen print on a tee will beat embroidery on cost above 50 units. A four-colour screen print might only beat embroidery above 200. And on a polo where the only viable decoration is a left-chest logo, embroidery often wins on both perception and price.

DTG — the short-run answer

Direct-to-garment printing is inkjet on fabric. The shirt sits on a platen, the print heads pass over it spraying water-based ink, and the result is photo-quality reproduction with no per-colour setup. For dark garments, the printer lays down a white underbase first, then the colour pass.

The strength of DTG: zero setup. One piece costs the same per piece as a hundred. Photo-realistic detail. Halftones and gradients reproduce naturally. It's the right method for print-on-demand, online stores, sample runs, one-off custom pieces, and any job under about 30 units where screen print setup costs would dominate.

The trade-offs: DTG ink sits on top of the fabric where screen print plastisol creates a thicker layer, so DTG prints generally feel softer but fade earlier. The cost-per-piece doesn't drop with volume the way screen print does, so DTG becomes uneconomic at higher unit counts. And not every fabric works — DTG performs best on 100% ring-spun cotton with a smooth surface; rougher weaves and heavy blends produce inconsistent results. Modern equipment handles polyester now, but it's still a harder substrate.

Sublimation — the polyester specialist

Dye sublimation works only on 100% polyester (or specifically-coated rigid substrates). Print the design onto sublimation paper, place it face-down on the garment, apply heat and pressure. The ink turns to gas, permeates the polyester fibres, and becomes part of the fabric. The result is a print that doesn't sit on top of the garment — it is the garment.

What sublimation does that nothing else does: full-coverage all-over prints. Colour saturation that doesn't crack or peel. Photo reproduction at any size. It's the right answer for sports jerseys, full-print performance wear, and any "the whole shirt is the design" application.

What sublimation can't do: print on cotton, print on dark garments (the gas dye can't lighten existing fabric colour, so backgrounds need to be white or pale), print on anything that doesn't have polyester in the fabric blend.

If your decoration brief says "we want full-bleed all-over print on a cotton hoodie", someone needs to have an honest conversation early: that doesn't exist. The choice is full-bleed sublimation on polyester, or large-coverage screen print on cotton, with both methods doing different things.

The special-effect tier — foil, glitter, rhinestones

Foil printing applies a metallic film to a printed adhesive layer using heat and pressure. Glitter heat transfer presses a glitter layer onto fabric using transfer paper. Rhinestones are heat-set crystals applied through transfer paper. All three are accent methods, not primary decoration.

The case for special effects: nothing else looks like them. Foil reads premium for fashion drops, awards, anniversaries, and event merch. Glitter and rhinestones still move volume in school dance, sports, and event apparel. Used carefully, they add perceived value that justifies a higher price point.

The honest version: special effects are the least durable decoration methods. Foil tarnishes and flakes after multiple washes. Glitter sheds. Rhinestones detach. Care instructions matter — turn inside out, wash cold, hang dry, never iron the print. If the buyer's use case is daily-wear staff uniforms, special effects are the wrong tier. If it's a limited-edition retail drop where the customer treats it carefully, they earn their place.

Which method for which job

For corporate uniforms with a logo on the chest: embroidery. Looks premium, lasts the program, scales to repeat orders without redo costs. The exception is loud, full-colour brand designs, which embroidery can't reproduce well — those go to screen print on the back, embroidered logo on the front.

For event merch and team apparel under 50 units: DTG, or screen print if the design is one or two colours. Anything multicolour and short-run is a DTG job nine times out of ten.

For brewery merch, retail drops, and brand-led runs of 100+: screen print. The per-piece cost wins, the print durability wins, and the look reads as "real merch" instead of "print on demand."

For sports teams, performance apparel, and full-coverage designs: sublimation on polyester. Don't fight the substrate.

For anything special — anniversary tees, limited drops, premium giveaways — special effects work as accents. Foil on a single hit. Rhinestones on lettering. Used as accents, not as the whole job.

Where this stops being right

Three places where the wrong method gets quoted because it's the easy method.

The first: screen print on a 15-piece run because the printer has the equipment idle. The setup cost gets buried in the per-piece price, but the buyer's paying for screens that'll get washed out the same day. DTG is almost always the right answer below 30 units. If your quote on a 15-piece job is screen print at $25 a tee, ask why.

The second: embroidery on a thin fashion tee because "embroidery looks more premium." On a 140 gsm tee, an embroidered logo pulls the fabric and puckers in the wash. Embroidery wants weight under it — 180 gsm minimum, ideally heavier. If the brief is fashion-tee aesthetics, screen print or DTG is the right call.

The third: foil on anything that goes through more than ten wash cycles. Foil is for limited-edition drops, anniversary pieces, and event apparel where the customer keeps it in a drawer. Foil on staff uniforms is a complaint generator.

The decoration question isn't "which method is best." It's "which method is right for this job, this substrate, this run length, this audience." Most of the time the answer is unambiguous once those four factors are on the table. The trouble starts when only one of them gets considered.

Subscribe to Merch Smarter — Printwear's weekly newsletter for business owners ordering merchandise for the first time, or the hundredth.